Village Hall |
255 East Wilson Ave. |
Lombard, IL 60148 |
villageoflombard.org |
Donald F. Ryan, Chairperson |
Commissioners: Martin Burke, |
Stephen Flint, Ronald Olbrysh, |
Ruth Sweetser, Rocco Melarkey |
and Sondra Zorn, Staff Liaison: William Heniff |
Chairperson Donald F. Ryan, Commissioner Stephen Flint, Commissioner |
Ronald Olbrysh, Commissioner Ruth Sweetser, Commissioner Sondra Zorn and |
Commissioner Martin Burke |
Fasil for 1625 S. Main. requesting a property he wants to annex into lombard and |
change zoning to r2. subdivide 2 lots one house facing main street. The utulities are |
curtrtently served by HighlandHills and they will still servebut will get lombard water. |
they have easement east of west corner of property, 17 ft. and inquiring for 10' to create |
2 lots. they are okayw ith it. have letters confirming to submit to village. |
Christian Heinz, on his behalf of surveying company and consultaing engineering |
company should you have any questions. |
No one to speak in favor or aginst. |
Bill gave staff report. petitoner take three actions, annexation, annexation agreement by |
bot, and map amendment from r1 to r2. request will consist of exisitng house being |
razed and subdvision to be done administratively. lots orientated toward 17th street. |
included in staff report are comments from engineering, pw that talk about the |
development should this occur. Planning with cp. and is in lombards planning area. |
corporate boundaries on all sides but north. cp recommends estate residential - 10,00o |
sq. ft. lots. these lots will be comparable to intent of this designation and mirrors the |
uses in Falcom Meadows. Pet. will be responsible for st4reet improvements and as |
noted on plat of resubdivision. pet. will abrogate an easement on the east side of the |
property. sanitary sewer constructed in rear of theese properties. hh will prepare this |
document. |
Staff recomnmends approval subject to 3 conditions. |
Commiossioners: |
Ro - no problem with request but want to cinform - staff report - exisitng residentials to |
the east. if this approved and once these homes put up, one might think this is part of |
the falcon meadows sub. BH - visually. RO in same price rnage. BH yes |
RS- conditiona 2 - does those include the parkway, sidewalk, and those kinds of things. |
BH - those are in our S&D ordinance. yes i would consider that all lpart because its a |
code issue. |
It was moved by Commissioner Olbrysh, seconded by Commissioner Sweetser, |
that this matter be recommended to the Corporate Authorities for approval |
subject to conditions. The motion carried by the following vote: |
Enactment No: Ordinances 5243, 524 |
Tom Yaeger, 104 S. Main, Park Ridge. will cover the architctural elements and planning |
components. and introduced the other two that will be possibly speaking. The project |
is the 1st church well over 100 years of age. he pointed to an area to be removed and |
the 1957 addition (church office area) composed of three buildings on site. In addition |
there is a residence at 18 and 24 ash and adjacent to it is 28 ash. the only other |
residential abutter is off of Maple. the improvement is removal of old addition at the far |
north end of existing church building. the problem is that is has detoriated, doesn't tie in |
and has horrible accessibility. It is about1700 square feet and will be replaced with multi |
use of about 4,800 sq. ft. per floor. He mentioned the lift. the character in terms of |
archictural rfeatures, and you cannot match it up. from a material viewpoint intend to |
use the same type of materials. some features to be cmpabitle is to recognize the |
gothic features, windows, . He showed the new addition, the north face, and repeated |
some elements of existing builidng and he described it. this mirrored on the east and |
west side. Important to note that this addition is less in height than the adjacent |
residential. One variation requests that relates to this trns. sideyard but doesn't meet |
the 20'. The other major ocmponents are the off street parking. the plat at 18 w. ash |
will be razed and combined to eliminate the need for landscape island to get as much off |
street parking because they are still well under parking req. The outreach programs in |
18 w ash will be moved at 24 w. ash. the parking and drive area will require fire |
dimensation. one access will be one way in, there is an area for a dumpster and the |
garage will be reclocated from 18 to another location adjacent to the playground. A |
fence would be betwen 24 and 28 ash and the petitioner is ahppy to meet the |
requirements of having this fence to prodive privacy. they are landscaping the buffer |
strip along Ash and ormanmental landscape along another section he pointed to. He |
showed the west and east elevation of the multi use space. |
Mark Myer, chaired building task force for several years. he asked the minister to |
address the aspect of the ocnditional use and introducted rob Hatfield. Senior Minister |
of 1st Church. Hatfield mentioned the coop and nursery school and they want to |
continue. by doing this project we tear up their playground. the other cu has to do with |
the relocated of the coop. He described what First Things First does which is a baby |
needs mninistry distributed to people in need in community. They have a building suited |
for this need is this is approved. they asked neighbors for their agreement which is |
outlined in staff report. want to use new building for variety of new ministries. |
Mark mentioned they have addressed neighbors concerns by way of landscaping and |
fencing and believe these issues of welfare, safety and environemental to maintain |
proeprty values and are here to address any qeustions. |
No one present to speak in favor or against. |
Backensto gave background information. He described the various building and what |
they provide. she stated the petitioner's request. The IDRC comments stated included |
Engineering's two conditions. PW's had no comments but once final engineering |
submitted. Fire & BIS - had seven conditions. Planning - CP reocmmends institional |
uses which conforms. Has submitted a plat of consolidation which can be done |
administratively. She mentioned the surrounding land uses and stated that the |
establishment is over 100 years and predates zoning regulations. cu - mentioned the |
various conditoonal uses there is no change to these activities.She mnetioned ordinance |
2889. since petiitoner will not amend conditional use, 24 w. ash overnight stays will be |
prohibited. Staff has no objection to these request. Shoudl any other uses be added |
then an amended cu will be required. approval of a pd will allow more flexibility. |
Rezoning - to B5a. Trantional building , landscaping islands will not be rquired |
tomaximize parking spaces. She mentioned the requirments for parking spaces or 142 |
parking spaces, decifict of 97 spaces. Staff belives that the room for parking outweights |
the need for landscapeislands. building height - variation for church steeple. zoning |
ordiannce requires two stories or 30 feet. staff has no objection to this request. |
Building elevations - concept drawing submitted. design intended to reflect some the |
arch. element of the chapel and staff feels that the deisn is compatbile. Historical |
significance \hhas not been endangered. Staff recoomends relative to conditons. |
RO- do like materials and deisgn and how it blends. The chapel still stands as historic |
building on campus. pleased aboutthe IHPA the addiiton will not impact historical status. |
What is costs of project? rick about 28 million. RO - Fire & Buyilding comments - |
existing structure you mean the church. Yes they do. With repsect to the historicla |
chapel is it now fire alarmed. smoke and heat detectors. petitioner - yes. RO - worried |
about rash of fires in religious institutions. |
Ryan - complement architural elements and appreciate their input fromthe previous |
workshops as well as to ingress. |
MB - staff report that the IHPA willnot affect status. if this is now a PD that will not have |
an impact either. BH - the netire cmpus will be one lot of record and willnot affect status. |
RS - approving the PD deviations, point e. is not mentioned when the others are. is that |
automatic but since the others are referened why is that not. JB not prosoping any |
changes . She referred to 6 and wnated to proect and have motion be reflective of all |
the actions. JB all deviations and vartiation included in motion because you approve the |
conditional use. |
SF - architect this is a good presenation. They are familiar with church and the high |
quality programs involved. |
RS - thnk ou for takingour comments into consideration. |
It was moved by Commissioner Sweetser, seconded by Commissioner Zorn, that |
this matter be recommended to the Corporate Authorities for approval subject to |
conditions. The motion carried by the following vote: |
Enactment No: Ordinances 5238 & 52 |
Fida Shawallani. presented the petition 5N158 Oxtail Lane, Bartlett, requesting for |
aspecial use for adrive thru restaurant at 844 e. roosevelt. this site is approxaminly 1 |
acre in size. it was orignally used by burger kind with drive thru and currently used as |
myodo. they also use drive thru when applied for liquor license they had to close. His |
petition is to have drive thru approved for cu. |
No one to speak in favor or against. |
Heniff - gave request. convert myodoa back to fast food rest with dirve thru. will be into |
popeyes restaurant. the site plan is proposing site improvements to bring the |
propertyinto modern standards for the popeyes franchise. he noted the IDRC |
comments. Planning - compliance with zo - the dirve thru listed as cu. since 12 months |
passed a new cu needs to be approved. staff requires that the circulation be brought up |
to code. the landscape plan - staff requests that a full landscapeplan address parkway |
trees and perimeter lot landscaping. He addressed the bent flag pole which needs to be |
removed. Signage - petition will install a new freestanding sign with manual reader |
message board. one wall sign light by gooseneck llights. no releift for signate as part of |
this petition. The parking for this site excceeds requirements. mentioned the far west |
stall which needs to be removed and replaced with landscaping . Staff recommends |
approved with ocnditions. |
Commissioenrs: |
RS - have none - conditiona 2 landscpe islands should be plural, I see two ont he plan. |
BH - conditon two needs to be changed to add "s". Ryan asked if when they aprpoved |
steak and lobster did they approve????? BH - it came in to code and no releif |
requested. |
RO - no problem - but questions with staff. Fire & Building - fire suppression system is a |
sprinkler system or is it more than that. BH - it's the same. |
It was moved by Commissioner Sweetser, seconded by Commissioner Olbrysh, |
that this matter be recommended to the Corporate Authorities for approval |
subject to conditions. The motion carried by the following vote: |
Enactment No: Ordinance 5242 844 E |
Heniff - village staff inditiated relative to deck hiehgt attached to new residential. this |
items workshoped twice . foru public record staff has attached workshops and . permit |
open terrace and decks as a permitted objstruciton...... he reqd . Staff noted the |
standards for text amendments and offers an analysis whey this should be considered. |
1.. General applicability - beneift any single family residential lot which topographical |
changes prevent the construction of a rear deck. this issue is more prevelent int he |
village as topo changes are incurred due to stormwater detetention facilities. only for |
single family residential uses. nature of commercial decks would besubject to a |
separate conditional use. 2. consistency of amnedment with t he ojbectives of this |
ordinance and the intent of the zdistrict regulations. staff feels that impacts orf attached |
decks would not create an aesthitic . still would have to meet 50 open space |
requirement only looking at required height above grade. 3. degree to which the |
proposed amendment would create nonconformity. is less restrictive than the current |
reg. 4. more permissive - amendment would make the overall codes less restrictive |
with respect to the permissiable h iehgt of the deck in close proximity to the residence in |
the rear yard. 5. consistency with CP - variety of house design should besup-ported. |
may lead to more unique housing styles. 6. Village policy on previous ruling - he gave |
those. Staff proposed a text amendment incorporating the table in 155.212 and how it |
will belayed out. The fifth section on page 5 . they are adding a dding footnote A & B. |
of which you must pick one. Must be open, 1ft. requirement above the foundation line. |
minimun of 25' year yard setback must be maintained. |
Commisisoners: |
RS - anything different would come as a variation. BH \ yes. RS - she referecned some |
establishment in Glen Ellyn that had multiple levels (3) and wanted to know if it was |
precluded? |
It was moved by Commissioner Olbrysh, seconded by Commissioner Flint, that |
this matter be recommended to the Corporate Authorities for approval. The |
motion carried by the following vote: |
Enactment No: Ordinance 5246 Text |
November 18 minutes. Staff has one correction on page 3 - amending the motion per |
Heniff. |
Staff passed out latest development project list for reference. Submitted a copy of 2003 |
calendor . Next month meeting is the 27th instead of the 20th. There is a potential that |
meeting might be cancelled if not petitions received. He also introduced Angela Clark |
who started 2 weeks ago. She will be working with staff and brining petitioner forward. |
he gaver her school and working background and working on her MBA. |
Since this is last meeting of year, hwe wishes everyone a merry and health holiday |
season. 8:45 p.m. |